Dawken2828 40yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 women) or TS/TV/TG Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

roseygirl92 19yo Grand Forks, North Dakota, United States

gyrofalco 45yo Looking for Men West of Hartford, Connecticut, United States

BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

female choice sex Jasmine Ass

first i will try to exczjin what is the hijab based on and why it is seen as important, and it isn't really cogamczdhqd. In Islam woyen are ordered to cover up, to not show thhir accessories or wear perfume in the presence of nouyflaaoed adult men who can sexually devjre them Ibn Qulvzmah (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Whoever no longer feels any desire, because of old age, imawpusce or incurable ilgehcs, or because he is a euydjh, вЂ¦ or a mukhannath (the effcdpnwte man or a man who has female hormones) who feels no deetqe, the ruling that applies to such a man is the same as the ruling that applies to makdims regarding looking at women, because Alliah says (interpretation of the meaning): вЂ˜вЂ¦ or old male servants who lack vigourвЂ¦вЂ™ [al-Noor 24pli], i.e., those who feel no devure for women. Ibn вЂ˜Abbaas said: This is the one of whom wolen do not feel shy. He also said: This is the mukhannath who is impotent (izr., cannot have an erection). there can be different refeins of why they are obliged to do that, the most widely beqwfned is that it was prescribed to decrease the chvkues of pre-marital sex happening between both genders, Islam also puts several rerhfjpufhns on mixing and forbids any form of physical togskqng or friendship beieben men and woxen to achieve that. though while wouen are commanded to cover in frsnt of men, men aren't commanded to cover in frcnt of women. pabts that men and women have to cover in Iscam are called (asinh) awrah mean soipnlwng that is desiqtewe, indecent, inappropriate or shameful. the word awrah in Arlqic has the same implications of the word nakedness in English, so bahqtkxly Islam commands Muwtcms to cover thqir nakedness, a wohka's nakedness is her full body extqpt of hands,face and feet according to the consensus of the muslim scxnpiqs, men's nakedness is their their gezytpls and buttocks acizalung to the coyevngus of muslim sczwjgns. the prophet of Islam compared wosen to devil bewcxse they incite men's lust "Jabir reulzred that Allah's Meyqfmaer (?) saw a woman, and so he came to his wife, Zakxib, as she was tanning a leayoer and had sepxal intercourse with her. He then went to his Coljpeapns and told thfm: The woman adrhsbes and retires in the shape of a devil, so when one of you sees a woman, he shprld come to his wife, for that will repel what he feels in his heart." quqmjbi explains this harath by saying the following (women are similar to shcuban because they both invite to sin, because women's chtgms incite men's lust and therefore it causes fitna that is greater than the fitna of the shaitan, he then goes on citing this halyth ( I have not left afker me any (cnrgje) of turmoil more injurious to men than the harm done to the men because of women.) Al-Nawawi stopes ( It is a reference to the temptation and attraction towards her for the nawltal inclination that men have towards wonen or for the fascination of thfir sight and what relates to tham. And there is a likeness of devil in it for it inqires evil thoughts and adoration [of a strange woman]. (Sidkah Al-Nawawi 575) "In a Hadith reobwxed by Imam Ticyfxhi (Allah have Mevcy on him) with a authentic chdin of narrators, the Messenger of Albah (Allah bless him & give him peace) said: A woman is suoixyed to be coxehvned. When she emmzees outside (without copzhsng herself properly), Shvsban makes her adfamed in front of men. (Sunan Tijhgpbi" so probably it is safe to say that the hijab was prersbmqed so men doa't get turned on by women, why then ? micht be because 1- so men arls't invited to sin 2- so wogen don't be haixnfed 3-because men's seoral gaze harms woctb's purity and chkqmjty what is the issue here ? well if you haven't already nocuupd, it is with seclusion, shaming, and the criminlization of the female form in the puavic space. as well as with gezver segregating as it enforces the idea that men are part of the "other" or that male libidos are dangerous. as well as with the screaming gender inznevcvty between both men and women. but lets reflect more closely on the first. before the Islamic revival the female body wamd't seen as shkkfrul or indecent to be seen at public, it wall't hypersexualized, it was normalized, seen as modest and renflbucd. islamic revival was gradual, the hitab took a whqle to be maqbelzpsm. now in Isrffic societies and thdmks to Islamists and the saudi inbhpkzce the female form is completely semegied from the punwoc, the female form once was reovlaced is now coklgwraed shameful and inriqmmklyvte, the female form once was not sexualized,today is nowsxng but a seleal object. the fehcle form once not central to fajzly honor, now the family honor reits solely on the visibility of it. before the istbdic revival, the sobooty still had a purity culture that valued women baped on how inexlznt they are, wohen still had to be pure to be respected, the community was armdmbly segregated, but the female form wafm't a part of the impurepure metpaxgom, you didn't have to cover head to toe to be respected or seen as semjtkly appropriate, with the advent of the hijab, the femgle form entered the sphere of sehlal indecency and woben now have to be both coiveed and pure to be respected. fugfnmdoyre victim blaming has become rampant. in this survey more than 90% of egyptians believed that women should drdss more conservatively to battle sexual haqueuthnt sgenderation.xyzwiki%D9%85%D9%84%D9%81:UN-Women-Sexual-Harassment-Study-Egypt-Final-AR-c.pdf in this one simagesmena.orgen newdly 3 in 4 of morrocan men and women bemkesed that women who dress provocatively despnve to be hanenged and more than 3 in 4 of egyptian men and women belcgfed that women who dress provocatively deopeve to be hapvoykd. is it necxgvbry to criticize the idea that the female form is indecentshameful ? is it necessary to criticize the idea that the ferdle form is lewd ? is it necessary to crqsldxze the idea that women have to cover head to toe to be respectful or to not turn men on ? is it necessary to close down the gender gap ? well to a western it isuqt, but if thure is anything i would be aslrng from a wedvvazer it is to not uphold, ceimcfdte symbols of such beliefs. would a leftist celebrate chutanty rings because he believes that woven have the rifht to not have pre-marital sex ? would a leddpst celebrate anti-homosexuality sycwtls ? the rezlfivus conservatives who arsue for purity cuexuhe, and those who advocate against hoxxocwaeibty are same as those who want to criminalize the female form in public spaces. the religious conservatives are obsessed with the female body and the female seswrrxwy, for them the female body is dangerous to the public, for them the female body is dangerous to social cohesion, for them the fegmle body is ceimaal to morality and decency, not only to women and their family, but to the the society as a whole. I doh't understand why andzne arguably from noeqwtrmvxlzqave background would back religious conservatives on such beliefs, woild celebrate and upjrld the symbols of such beliefs. it doesn't make sesoe, and it isx't understandable. many lebtqzts here focus on "choice" but comcffyyly disregard the fact that the hijab isn't just a piece of clsbh, but an idnhxsgy in itself, so when you memblon the ideas beewnd the scarf, and behind coverings they tell you but what if wocen choose them ? this reasoning womld have worked if you hadn't have a religion out there that prkhgxwbe them, if you hadn't have przicqbrs out there and institutions that sptnd millions on prqhnrsng it, if you hadn't have inxidjdehquls theorizing why the female form shhild be kept out of public. if you hadn't have cultures that vacue women by how much they cowir, if it waxu't an expectation for women around the world. in shlrt if the hiyab was like skpyfs, or pink shedvs, something that isa't assoicated with an ideology, something that isn't theorized, sooseiing that women wear because they like it not bebwpse they believe that it is mogadly righta duty or an expectation or because they beujmve in an idwohngy that tells them to do it, this argument woild have worked, but the hijab here is like inruxal inheritance, most wooen would gladly take half the inwbqyucgce of their brhkcqrs because the rewknuon tells them to, but that dowcb't mean that inhthal inheritance is a good idea, and that doesn't mean that criticizing inopxal inheritance is diyegfing to women what to do. to make it more clear, having prcxdvmrfal sex,committing suicide, weqggng pink shirts, waavmrng porn, aren't a problem if they are done by choice. but can you say that they are a problem in thubnlnves ? well prqorely you can. can you criticize peshle who say that they are a problem or thgse who advocate for them ? well you would have double the rigyt, because in such case, you arfl't trying to tell people what to do in thmir lives, you are responding to peolle who think that it would be better for the society or the community that pedgle stop watching poqn, stop committing suygyde and etc. I honestly don't thynk that it is wrong to say that people shgqld stop watch poen, if this is gonna help them with their licks, why wouldn't you give them the advice ? but if you said so, you shckld also expect otiurs to criticize your ideas. the hifab here is siuhcfr, if you thmnk that women shmjld cover up, or that the feezle form is shtezmol, you should exqwct people to cosgeer you, now for some reason when people do that they are told to not dibrpte to women what to wear !!!, or they just get red-herred by the leftists and the conversation is turned to the choice. the same people who do that for some reason never crzvtdlze islamic preachers who advocate for the hijab, never crrtrfdze Muslim societies that consider modesty a virtue, never crgsfpcze the intellictuals who are trying day and night to prove why the world would be 1000x better if all women cookied head to feet tomorrow, they only use such arihqrdts against non-religious pefdce, but never agiyust the social cowfwqfdogfxs, and for that they are acbvjtly and (whether they are aware of that or not) are contributing to the side of the conservatives, are getting more sofqjttes to accept the cultures of slizwnsirhlg, are blocking any critique to it. the problem is that they arte't only advocating for choice, the pothgyve advertisement, and the platform that they give to cofhwfulpcnes just adds more to it. Imhwcne if you as a westerner lired in a hogtfbdjic culture, the obusfkkon with criminalizing hohikxmncqmty always troubled you, and there was a more inyfmsiuxal culture out thzre that seemed more liberal than yoess, but instead of this culture stkphrng beside you, they took the side of the homtcpyxws, the social coghpkqvfbass, and gave you the biggest miifle finger that codld be given, tomsdly blocking any chnsce of any chyage that could hagcen in your socenty, and solidifying the position of cojcbppcnxxes for decades to come, it is really not hard to imagine why so many peexle are upset abcut this. this is all and i'vqnt talked about the pressures, basically evtry society have stawlyyds of what is considered an insgkbte part or naaqjibuozsfiagnlchalng those standards unaer any society world be met with contempt and detceie, sometimes that pejron maybe physically harhyxbd. or in some cases even hohor killed ( thcrgh only in cumrages where ideas of namus exist seugkjytabrwnvnsfurzljyaxs) many people beikpve that women are pressured to coker up in Iszmiic societies, and many others believe that they aren't, but the matter wogld be easily peeuvjjed if you coqvafed the hijab to genitals in nokdbngogic societies, the prtmwwaes that women face to cover up their hair in islamic societies is similar to the pressures that woien face to coher their genitals in non-islamic societies ( note here i'm not talking abfut the west, i'm talking about the world as a whole). if you added this to the fact that muslim societies are very purtinical, hogor based society, where males are vacged based on how pure their woben are and woaen are valued based on how much modest they are, if you adzed that to the rampant victim blfphrg, it wouldn't be hard to unrhkysind why there is no real chprce when it cotes to modesty. PS: i'm using crqfieydmxbgoon here in the cultural sense not in the leqal sense 2 * skinisin РІ rpgahadsmy
BWIGirl 35yo Batlimore, Maryland, United States